Agave Syrup vs Honey: Nutrition and Glycemic Comparison

Agave Syrup vs Honey: Nutrition & Glycemic Comparison
Comparing agave syrup vs honey sounds simple—until you start looking at glycemic index numbers, fructose content, and “natural sweetener” marketing.
Agave syrup vs honey (quick decision snippet)
If you’re here to answer “Which one should I use?” this is the fastest, most practical breakdown:

- Vegan? Choose agave (honey is bee-derived).
- Lower glycemic impact on paper? Agave is often lower GI than honey, based on tested products in the University of Sydney Glycemic Index database.
- Want to limit fructose? Honey is often less fructose-heavy than agave (portion size still matters).
- Need quick workout fuel? Honey is often a better pick than agave because it provides more glucose (faster-use energy).
- Baking reliability? Honey is thicker and has a stronger flavor; agave is thinner and often tastes sweeter, so swaps usually aren’t 1:1.
Neither is a “free food.” Both are concentrated sugars—so the best move for most people is using less of whichever you enjoy.
Quick answer: what’s the difference between agave syrup and honey?
- Agave syrup (agave nectar) is a plant-based sweetener made by processing agave sap into a pourable syrup.
- Honey is made by bees from flower nectar. Its taste, color, and nutrient profile can vary by flower source and processing.
The big tradeoff: agave tends to be fructose-heavier, while honey tends to be a more mixed blend of sugars. If you want an easy way to compare fructose grams directly, see our fructose table in Fructose — Not So Sweet After All.
Agave vs honey nutrition (per tablespoon)
Nutrition varies by brand and processing, but these are commonly cited label-style values:

| Per 1 Tbsp | Honey | Agave syrup (light) | What to notice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | ~64 kcal | ~60 kcal | Very similar calorie-wise |
| Total carbs | 17.3 g | 16 g | Both are mostly carbohydrate |
| Total sugars | 17.3 g | 14 g | Still “added sugar” in practice |
| Fiber | ~0 g | 0 g | Neither provides meaningful fiber |
Data sources:
- Honey nutrition per tablespoon: University of Rochester Medical Center
- Light agave nectar nutrition per tablespoon: WebMD
A quick reality check on “natural”
Even if a sweetener starts in a beehive or a plant, it can still function like added sugar in your diet.
The American Heart Association suggests limiting added sugars to about 100 calories/day for women (6 tsp) and 150 calories/day for men (9 tsp).
Glycemic index: agave vs honey (and why the number isn’t the whole story)
Glycemic index (GI) is about how quickly a carb-containing food tends to raise blood glucose compared to a reference food. But GI values can vary with formulation, processing, and what else you eat.
A good reminder of this variability: the University of Sydney Glycemic Index database lists multiple tested GI values for both agave products and honey varieties.
What you’ll typically see
- Agave nectar: Tested products in the database include a “light” agave nectar (90% fructose) at GI 11 and a “premium” agave nectar at GI 19 (browse “agave” results in the University of Sydney GI database).
- Honey: Tested values vary by type—for example acacia honey GI 53, Australian honey GI 59, and buckwheat honey GI 73 (browse “honey” results in the University of Sydney GI database).
Why GI isn’t the whole story
- GI is about carb quality, not portion size. A small amount of a higher-GI sweetener may have less real-world impact than a larger amount of a lower-GI sweetener.
- GI values can be fuzzy in real life. The Linus Pauling Institute notes that estimating GI for mixed meals can be inaccurate because preparation and composition change the response.
That’s why glycemic load can be more useful.
Glycemic load (GL): why serving size matters (and how to calculate it)
Glycemic load (GL) combines:
- How fast a carb tends to raise blood sugar (GI)
- How much carbohydrate you’re actually eating (portion size)
The Linus Pauling Institute summarizes the standard formula as:
GL = (GI × grams of available carbohydrate per serving) ÷ 100
Quick estimate: GL per tablespoon (approximate)
If we use representative GI values from tested products (for example, honey around GI ~59 and agave around GI ~19) and the carb grams from the table above:
- Honey (1 Tbsp): GL ≈ 59 × 17.3 ÷ 100 ≈ 10.2
- Agave (1 Tbsp): GL ≈ 19 × 16 ÷ 100 ≈ 3.0
Important: these are back-of-the-napkin estimates—GI varies by product, and your blood sugar response also depends on the rest of the meal.
How to use GL thinking in real life: If you want steadier blood sugar, focus on the whole snack/meal, not just the sweetener. Pairing sweeteners with protein, fiber, and fat often produces a more gradual rise in blood sugar than carbohydrates eaten on their own.
For a practical way to track carbs and portions, see our guide to carb counting and label reading.
The fructose factor: why agave’s “low GI” can be misleading
Agave’s low GI is often explained by its high fructose content, since fructose doesn’t raise blood glucose the same way glucose does.
The catch: fructose is metabolized differently than glucose and is handled largely by the liver (overview in the StatPearls fructose metabolism chapter). One reason this matters: a sweetener can look “better” on GI while still being something you don’t want to lean on heavily day after day.
A practical way to think about this is grams, not vibes:
- Our fructose breakdown lists agave syrup at 10.3 g fructose per tablespoon and honey at 8.6 g fructose per tablespoon in our guide to fructose.
Honey’s potential upsides (and where they matter)
Honey isn’t a health food—but compared to agave, it may come with more naturally occurring trace compounds (including small amounts of minerals and plant-derived compounds). In practical terms, though, those amounts are usually small per tablespoon, so the “health halo” tends to outpace the nutrition.
For workout fuel: honey is often the more practical choice
If your main use-case is pre-workout energy or post-workout carbs, honey is often easier to justify than agave:
- Healthline notes that honey contains a meaningful amount of glucose (along with fructose), while agave is typically much higher in fructose.
- Fructose is metabolized primarily in the liver, as described in StatPearls, whereas glucose is more directly usable by working muscle.
Practical takeaway: for “quick energy” needs, honey tends to behave more like a fast carb than agave. For everyday sweetening, the portion size matters more than the brand name.
Two other considerations that matter more than marketing
- Dose matters: the benefits you might get from trace compounds are easier to erase if your total added sugar intake climbs.
- Processing matters: honey’s composition can change with heating and filtration—so “raw” or less-processed honey may retain more of its naturally occurring compounds than heavily processed varieties.
Culinary differences: taste, thickness, and heat
If you care about results in the kitchen, honey and agave are not interchangeable 1:1 in every recipe.
Flavor
- Honey is usually more floral/earthy and varies a lot by variety.
- Agave tends to be more neutral, with a mild caramel-like note.
Texture (and why your recipe behaves differently)
- Honey is typically thicker, which can change batter thickness and how a glaze sets.
- Honey can crystallize (hardening over time) because it’s a supersaturated sugar solution; an explanation of honey crystallization notes that glucose crystallizes more easily, which is one reason some honeys crystalize faster than others.
- Agave tends to stay liquid and dissolves quickly in cold drinks, as noted by WebMD.

Sweetness intensity
Agave is often described as sweeter than white sugar, meaning you may need less (per WebMD). Honey is also sweet, but its stronger flavor often limits how much you’ll want to use.
Substitution guide: how to swap agave and honey without ruining the recipe
Because brands vary and recipes are sensitive, think of these as starting points.
Low-risk swaps (drinks, yogurt, oatmeal, dressings)
- Start with a 1:1 swap and adjust to taste.
- If the result is too sweet, use less agave next time.
Baking swaps (where swaps can break texture)
- Replace 1 cup honey with ~2/3 to 3/4 cup agave as a starting point.
- Because agave is thinner, you may need to slightly reduce other liquids to keep batter consistency similar.
Honey-forward recipes
If the recipe is “honey roasted” or “honey glazed,” substituting agave can change the flavor dramatically. Agave tends to work best when honey’s distinct flavor isn’t the main feature.
Decision matrix: which sweetener fits your goal?
Use this as a quick filter—not as medical advice.

| If you prioritize… | Honey | Agave syrup | What to do |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vegan cooking | Not vegan | Vegan-friendly | Choose agave, but keep portions modest |
| Lower glycemic impact (typical) | Often higher GI than agave | Often lower GI than honey | Use GL thinking; portion size matters |
| Minimizing fructose | Often lower fructose than agave | Often higher fructose than honey | Prefer honey (or use less sweetener overall) |
| Workout fuel / quick energy | Often a better fit (more glucose) | Often less ideal (more fructose) | For training carbs, honey is usually the simpler pick |
| Flavor complexity | More distinctive | More neutral | Pick based on the recipe |
| Keeping added sugars down | Easy to overdo | Easy to overdo | Keep total added sugar modest |
If you’re working on metabolic health (like insulin resistance), the sweetener choice is just one lever—overall dietary pattern, protein intake, and activity matter more. Our insulin resistance guide breaks down the big rocks.
Frequently asked questions
Is agave nectar healthier than honey?
Not automatically. In many lab tests, agave products come in with a lower GI—but they’re often more fructose-heavy. Honey tends to have a wider GI range depending on variety. Either way, both are still concentrated sugars.
Which is better for blood sugar: honey or agave?
If you’re only comparing GI values, agave is often lower. But your blood sugar response depends on serving size and the rest of the meal, and mixed-meal GI estimates can be unreliable, as noted by the Linus Pauling Institute.
If you’re actively managing diabetes or reactive hypoglycemia, monitor your individual response and discuss sweetener choices with your clinician or a registered dietitian.
Can I replace honey with agave 1:1?
Sometimes—especially in drinks and sauces. In baking, a 1:1 swap can over-sweeten and change texture because agave is thinner and often tastes sweeter.
Are honey and agave “added sugars”?
Yes—when you add them to foods or beverages. Sweeteners like honey and syrups are included in guidance around added sugars (see the ingredient-list guidance from the American Heart Association).
The bigger picture for body composition
Sweetener swaps are helpful—but the bigger win usually comes from reducing overall added sugar intake, building meals around macronutrients like protein and fiber, and getting consistent activity.

If your goal is better metabolic health, tracking can provide objective feedback:
- Use our carb counting and label reading guide to apply GL/portion awareness and reduce “sugar creep.”
- If cravings are the issue, start with our guide on how to stop sugar cravings.
- If you’re curious about sweeteners that may have less impact on blood sugar, our guide to allulose, a lower-glycemic alternative breaks down how it works, how it tastes, and how to use it.
And if you’re trying to see whether your nutrition changes are improving key metrics—like fat mass, lean mass, and visceral fat—pair your habit changes with a DEXA scan.
A DEXA scan can quantify body composition changes you won’t catch on the scale. You can book a BodySpec DEXA scan to establish a baseline and track trends over time.
Key takeaways
- Agave syrup vs honey isn’t a simple “healthy vs unhealthy” choice. Both are concentrated sugars.
- In many tests, agave has a lower glycemic index—but it’s also often more fructose-heavy.
- Honey may include more naturally occurring trace compounds, but the amounts per tablespoon are usually small.
- For blood sugar steadiness, glycemic load + meal context beats obsessing over a single GI number.


